Appellate Review of Trial Court Decisions
Understanding the different standards of review is necessary to the lawyer's informed reading of the appellate opinion. Further, the lawyer should use standard of review to discuss with the client the nature of the trial court's decision and the likelihood of success on review. If the client understands the difference between questions of law, which are reviewed de novo, and discretionary decisions, which are generally deferred to unless unreasonable, he or she will form realistic expectations about the trial and whether to consider an appeal. This casebook discusses the role of appellate courts and the history of appellate review and presents an overview of the concepts of scope of review and standard of review. It is organized into chapters on the different standards of review and includes notes and questions. The book is adaptable to a lecture-discussion format or as a classroom adjunct to a seminar-research paper arrangement.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Review of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
B Conclusions of Law
Questions of Law
18 other sections not shown
10th Cir 2d Cir 9th Cir abuse of discretion administrative affirmed agency action agency's alimony alleged Amendment Antonetti appellate court apply argues certiorari Circuit claim clear error clearly erroneous Commission conclusion confession Congress constitutional error conviction Corp counsel Court of Appeals criminal D.C. Cir decision defendant defendant's deference denied determination dismissal district court doctrine due process enforcement exercise factual Federal Rules findings of fact Fulminante granted habeas harmless harmless-error hearing instruction issue judge's judicial review jurisdiction juror jury jury instructions Justice L.Ed litigation matter Mayton motion novo review opinion parties petitioner plain error plaintiff presumption prior Procedure proceedings questions of law record relevant remand respondents reversed reviewing court S.Ct sentence Sixth Amendment standard of review statute statutory substantial evidence summary judgment supra Supreme Court testified testimony tion trial court trial judge United verdict violation voir dire WHDH