Are military adultery standards changing? What are the implications?: hearing before the Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, Restructuring, and the District of Columbia of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, second session, October 7, 1998
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Heimbach Daniel R
Letter to Senator Brownback from Elaine Donnelly dated Nov 2 1998
Other editions - View all
act of adultery administration Air Force allegations of adultery American armed forces Armed Services Army values Army's basic training behavior Bill Clinton bring discredit Campbell University Center for Military Chairman changes proposed Charles Krulak Chief of Staff Clinton Code of Military Colonel Maginnis combat Committee conduct Courts Martial Department of Defense directly prejudicial enforcement ethic Family Research Council future recruits going guidance Heimbach impact institution investigation issue Judith Miller Kelly Flinn leaders leadership Manual for Courts Manual for Courts-Martial Marine MAX CLELAND mili military adultery standards military culture military families Military Justice Military Readiness military services military's misconduct morale Navy offense officer order and discipline organization Pentagon percent pregnancy problem promotion proposed changes prosecute punishment rules Secretary Cohen Secretary of Defense Senator Brownback serve service discrediting service member servicemembers societal trends society Subcommittee U.S. Army UCMJ Uniform Code Washington William Cohen women