Are military adultery standards changing? What are the implications?: hearing before the Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, Restructuring, and the District of Columbia of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, second session, October 7, 1998
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Heimbach Daniel R
Letter to Senator Brownback from Elaine Donnelly dated Nov 2 1998
Other editions - View all
act of adultery Air Force allegations of adultery armed forces Armed Services Army values Army's basic training behavior Bill Clinton bring discredit Campbell University Center for Military Chairman changes proposed Charles Krulak Chief of Staff civilian Clinton Code of Military cohesion Colonel Maginnis combat conduct Courts Martial Department of Defense directly prejudicial disciplinary Donnelly enforcement ethic Family Research Council going guidance Heimbach impact institution investigation issue Judith Miller Kelly Flinn leaders leadership Manual for Courts Manual for Courts-Martial Marine MAX CLELAND mili military adultery standards military culture military families Military Justice Military Readiness military services military's moral Navy offense officer order and discipline organization Pentagon percent pregnancy President problems promotion proodsed proposed changes prosecute punishment rules Secretary Cohen Senator Brownback serve service discrediting service member servicemembers sexual harassment societal trends society statement UCMJ Uniform Code unit Washington William Cohen women