Are Military Adultery Standards Changing? What Are the Implications?: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, Restructuring and the District of Columbia of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, Second Session, October 7, 1998 |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Page | 1 |
Heimbach Daniel R | 7 |
Letter to Senator Brownback from Elaine Donnelly dated Nov 2 1998 | 100 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
act of adultery administration Air Force allegations of adultery American armed forces Armed Services Army values Army's basic training behavior Bill Clinton bring discredit Center for Military Chairman changes proposed Charles Krulak civilian Clinton Code of Military Colonel Maginnis combat Committee conduct Courts Martial Department of Defense directly prejudicial Donnelly enforcement ethic Family Research Council going guidance Heimbach impact institution investigation issue Judith Miller Kelly Flinn leaders leadership Manual for Courts Manual for Courts-Martial Marine MAX CLELAND mili military adultery standards military culture military families Military Justice Military Readiness military services military's misconduct morale Navy offense officer order and discipline Pentagon percent pregnancy President problem promotion proposed changes prosecute punishment rules Secretary Cohen Secretary of Defense Senator Brownback serve service discrediting service member sexual harassment shift societal trends society statement Subcommittee U.S. Army UCMJ Uniform Code Washington William Cohen women