Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making
This text presents a clear and concise explanation of argumentation and provides models for good argumentation, particularly as it applies to academic debate.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
academic debate adopted advantages advocates affirmative teams affirmative's plan American American Forensic Association answer apply argued argumentation and debate attack audience Bush campaign cause CEDA Chapter claim conclusion Congress considered counterplan Court criteria critical debate proposition definition dence develop Disad disadvantages Dukakis educational effective enthymeme establish evaluate example fallacies federal government forensic fossil fuel goals greenhouse greenhouse effect HTGR important increase Index indicate inherent intercollegiate debate judge major premise mass media means meeting ment method MOOERATOR motion negative teams negative's nuclear power nuclear weapons opponents organization percent prepared present Presidential problem prolif proposition Resolved protectionism prove question reactors reasoning rebuttal refutation render the decision require says second negative constructive seek Senate significant solve speaker specific speech status quo stock issues subpoint syllogism television there's tion tive topical tournament United vote weapons