Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making
This text presents a clear and concise explanation of argumentation and provides models for good argumentation, particularly as it applies to academic debate.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Applied and Educational Debate
Stating the Problem
18 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
adopting advantages advocates affirmative plan affirmative teams American American Forensic Association analysis apply argued argument attack audience ballot cause CEDA Chapter claim comparative advantages conclusion Congress considered counterplan courts critical debate proposition debating the proposition definition demonstrate develop disadvantages educational debate effective establish evaluate example fallacies federal government forensic goals hazardous waste important increase Index inherent intercollegiate debate issue judge justify mass media mass noun mative matter meeting ment method Mondale motion National Debate Tournament negative speaker negative teams nuclear opponents organization persons possible prepared present President problem proposition Resolved prove question Reagan reasoning rebuttal refutation render the decision require second affirmative second negative second negative constructive seek Senate significant Soviet Soviet Union specific speech status quo subpoint television tests of evidence tion tournament unemployment United usually vote World War III