Argumentation and debate: critical thinking for reasoned decision making
This text presents a clear and concise explanation of argumentation and provides models for good argumentation, particularly as it applies to academic debate.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Applied and Academic Debate
Stating the Controversy
22 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
academic debate adopting advantages advocates affirmative affirmative's plan American American Forensic Association analysis answer apply argued argument attack audience Bush Canada CEDA Chapter claim commitment conclusion Congress considered counterplan Court critical debate proposition defense definition dence develop disadvantages Dukakis educational effective enthymeme environmental environmental ethic establish ethic evaluate example fallacies federal government forensic goals going important increase inherent intercollegiate debate Israelite judge judicial Lapham Loeber major premise mass media means ment motion negative teams negative's NORAD nuclear weapons opponents organization prepared present Presidential problem prolif proposition Resolved prove question rebuttal refutation render the decision require response says second affirmative constructive second negative second negative constructive seek Senate significant solve solvency Soviet speaker specific speech status quo stock issues subpoint subs syllogism television there's tion tive tournament unemployment United vote West German whole resolution