Arguments and Arguing: The Products and Process of Human Decision Making
The primary focus of the updated, second edition has not changed-it embraces the narrative or storytelling approach to the study of argumentation. The first section introduces readers to rhetorical theorists and their principles. These significant contributions to the field of argumentation and debate include Aristotle's views on audiences and the ethical character of an advocate, Burke's dramatistic theory of communication, Brockriede's metaphorical image of arguers, Fisher's narrative paradigm, Mill's guidelines for testing the causal correlation, Perelman and Obrechts-Tyteca's conception of a universal audience, Rokeach's definition of values, and Toulmin's model for developing and analyzing argument claims and his conception of arguments as field dependent. Hollihan and Baaske's discussions of these ideas and their applications are easy to follow, unencumbered by technical jargon, and illustrated with engaging examples drawn from current and well-known historical events. The key to the success of this text is the authors' ability to show readers how foundational principles of argumentation are used in a variety of real-world situations. The second section covers specialized contexts such as academic debates, courts of law, politics, business and organizations, and interpersonal relationships. Activities that stimulate critical thinking and the implementation of the ideas discussed are provided at the end of each chapter.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Argumentation as a Human Symbolic Activity
The Foundations of Argument
Audiences and Fields of Argument
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
academic debate action advocate affirmative Afghanistan American Forensic Association analysis appeal argue arguers Argumentation Theory arguments attorneys audience believe better Bush campaign candidates chapter Chino Hills claim Communication competing consider construct convince Cooper counterplan court create credibility cross-examination culture decision defendant develop disagreement discussion dispute DNA testing effective evaluate evidence example fact fallacy focus identify important interactions Iraq jurors jury justify Kenneth Burke Kevin Cooper Lease house listening lives means ments metaphor minor premise narrative Narrative Paradigm nation National Debate Tournament negative organization person political premise present President problems programs proposed proposition questions reasoning rebuttal refutation resolution response result Rhetoric Ryen Saddam Hussein seek social sources specific speech stock issues stories strategies syllogism tell testimony tion topic Toulmin model trial understand value debate vote voters