Arguments for a Non-Transformational Grammar

Front Cover
University of Chicago Press, Nov 1, 1976 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 214 pages
0 Reviews
For the past decade, the dominant transformational theory of syntax has produced the most interesting insights into syntactic properties. Over the same period another theory, systemic grammar, has been developed very quietly as an alternative to the transformational model. In this work Richard A. Hudson outlines "daughter-dependency theory," which is derived from systemic grammar, and offers empirical reasons for preferring it to any version of transformational grammar.

The goal of daughter-dependency theory is the same as that of Chomskyan transformational grammar—to generate syntactic structures for all (and only) syntactically well-formed sentences that would relate to both the phonological and the semantic structures of the sentences. However, unlike transformational grammars, those based on daughter-dependency theory generate a single syntactic structure for each sentence. This structure incorporates all the kinds of information that are spread, in a transformational grammar, over to a series of structures (deep, surface, and intermediate). Instead of the combination of phrase-structure rules and transformations found in transformational grammars, daughter-dependency grammars contain rules with the following functions: classification, dependency-marking, or ordering.

Hudson's strong arguments for a non-transformational grammar stress the capacity of daughter-dependency theory to reflect the facts of language structure and to capture generalizations that transformational models miss. An important attraction of Hudson's theory is that the syntax is more concrete, with no abstract underlying elements.

In the appendixes, the author outlines a partial grammar for English and a small lexicon and distinguishes his theory from standard dependency theory. Hudson's provocative thesis is supported by his thorough knowledge of transformational grammar.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Introduction
1
Classification Rules
27
Structurebuilding Rules
66
4 Auxiliary Verbs
136
Conclusions and Implications
177
Daughterdependency Grammar
197
References
207
Index
213
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page iv - Lecturer at the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London) in his booklet Troubled Uganda, is very revealing439 : "Mr.

References to this book

All Book Search results »

Bibliographic information