What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
What is it? And how should it be assessed?
How do they Measure up?
2 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
academics submitted Algorithms Annex Arts and Humanities assessment process bad points bibliometric characteristics of high comparability disciplines Education Funding Bodies Education Funding Council Expert Review flexible flip chart four groups group suggested groups considered groups felt groups thought HEFCE HEFCW high quality research Higher Education Funding Higher Education Supplement Historical Ratings identified impact implementation improvement interdisciplinary research interim assessments issue Lecturers and Senior Mentioned in systems methodology metrics Northern Ireland organisations panel members Peer Recognition peer review person into group points and questions quality of research RAND Europe research active participants Research Assessment Exercise research assessment system research culture research excellence research fellows research managers rigour role senior academics senior lecturers SHEFC shown in Figure Sir Gareth Roberts staff Steven Wooding sticky labels subject areas submissions submitted to RAE2001 suggested that panels Task transparent UK Higher Education Units of Assessment UoAs Volume voting workshop group