Assessment, learning and employability
Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Oct 1, 2003 - Education - 245 pages
What is assessed gets attention: what is not assessed does not. When higher education is expected to promote complex achievements in subject disciplines and in terms of 'employability', problems arise: how are such achievements to be assessed? In the first part, Knight and Yorke argue that existing grading practices cannot cope with the expectations laid upon them, while the potential of formative assessment for the support of learning is not fully realised. Improving the effectiveness of assessment depends, they claim, on a well-grounded appreciation of what assessment is and what may and may not be expected of it. The second part is about summative judgements for high-stakes purposes. Using established measurement theory, a view is developed of the conditions under which affordable, useful, valid and reliable summative judgements can be made. A conclusion is that many complex achievements resist high-stakes assessment, which directs attention to low-stakes, essentially formative, alternatives. Assessment for learning and employability demands more than module-level changes to assessment methods. The final part discusses how institutions need to respond in policy terms to the challenges that have been posed. This book has wide and practical relevance - to teachers, module and programme leaders, higher education managers and quality enhancement specialists.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Higher Education and Employability
Summative Assessment in Disarray
14 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
A-level academic Alverno College approach to assessment assessment methods assessment practices assessment systems assessment tasks assessors authentic authentic assessment awards Chapter claims-making coherence communication community of practice complex achievements complex learning components context course criteria curricula curriculum degree differentiated emotional intelligence employability employers employment evaluation evidence example expected experience formative and summative formative assessment formative feedback goals grade indicators graduates high-stakes assessment higher education identify implies individual institutions issues judgements Knight learners learning intentions learning outcomes markers marks ment metacognition modular module Open University outcomes of learning peer assessment performance perspective plagiarism portfolio potential problems professional programme level Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Agency reflection reliability response scaffolding self-theories skills staff standards student learning subject discipline suggest summative assessment teachers tend tests thinking tion understanding University validity whilst workplace