Assisted Suicide: Theory and Practice in Elective Death
Court cases in the United States and Canada, and attendant media coverage, have transformed assisted suicide from an unspoken practice to a pressing social issue. Assisted suicide has joined abortion as one of the major and most intractable issues of our time. Behind the rhetoric of public debate, the truly important questions are whether assisted suicide ever makes good sense, whether assisting suicide should ever be permissible, and if so, what professional ethics should govern its provision.
Effective ethical guidance for assisted suicide is not lacking for want of effort, but rather because of conflict and dissent. Arguments about it arise from divergent conceptions of personal autonomy and the nature of human life. The hard fact that assisted suicide is practiced regardless of its legality makes questions about the ethics that govern it all the more urgent.
Professors Prado and Taylor strive to achieve a compromise between ethical theoreticians and clinicians by clarifying what is most at issue in their arguments. Among the topics of their discussion are the criteria for rational suicide; making a genuine, unimpaired choice; and the problem of the slippery slope. Though they do not agree, their collaboration results in a constructive exploration of one of the most difficult ethical dilemmas of our time.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Criteria for Rational Suicide
A Genuine Unimpaired Choice
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
acceptance of assisted afterlife aid in dying application Arthur Caplan assessment of patients assistance in suicide attending clinicians autonomy Battin belief can’t cessation of treatment choice choose cians cide clini clinical depression clinical ethicists commission of suicide commit suicide competence contravene criteria for rational death decisions about assisted empathic understanding ethical Globe and Mail ical individual individual's interest in survival irrational issue judgments Karen Ann Quinlan Kevorkian live medical contexts ment Michel Foucault moral one's interests perceptions permissibility of assisted person perspective potential suicidists practice principles problematic professional prognoses provision of assisted prudential interests question rational suicide rationality of suicide reasoning relinquish requested cessation requests for assisted requirements self-destruction sense slippery slope argument society someone someone's suffering suicidal decisions suicidal deliberation suicidal motivation suicide and assisted suicide in medical terminally ill theoretical theoreticians tion treatment decisions value interests voluntary euthanasia warrant York