Attacking Judges: How Campaign Advertising Influences State Supreme Court Elections
Nasty, below-the-belt campaigns, mudslinging, and character attacks. These tactics have become part and parcel of today's election politics in America, and judicial elections are no exception. Attacking Judges takes a close look at the effects of televised advertising, including harsh attacks, on state supreme court elections. Author Melinda Gann Hall investigates whether these divisive elections have damaging consequences for representative democracy. To do this, Hall focuses on two key aspects of those elections: the vote shares of justices seeking reelection and the propensity of state electorates to vote. In doing so, Attacking Judges explores vital dimensions of the conventional wisdom that campaign politics has deleterious consequences for judges, voters, and state judiciaries. Countering the prevailing wisdom with empirically based conclusions, Hall uncovers surprising and important insights, including new revelations on how attack ads influence public engagement with judicial elections and their relative effectiveness in various types of state elections. Attacking Judges is a testament to the power of institutions in American politics and the value of empirical political science research in helping to inform some of the most significant debates on the public agenda. This book's results smartly contest and eradicate many of the fears judicial reformers have about the damaging effects of campaign negativity in modern state supreme court elections.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
State Supreme Court Elections in Contemporary Democracy
Campaign Advertising in State Supreme Court Elections
Attack Advertising and Electoral Support for State Supreme Court Justices
Attack Advertising and Citizen Participation in State Supreme Court Elections
Other editions - View all
Attacking Judges: How Campaign Advertising Influences State Supreme Court ...
Melinda Hall,Melinda Gann Hall
No preview available - 2014
airings against incumbent American politics Ansolabehere and Iyengar appeals attack ads attack airings average ballot roll-off Bonneau and Cann Bonneau and M. G. Brennan Center campaign messages campaign negativity campaign spending candidates Chapter citizen participation contested races contrast airings defeat rates demobilization effects elec election cycle electoral performance empirical Figure Hall and Bonneau incumbency advantage incumbent vote institutional interest groups issue-based judges judicial elections judiciaries legislative M. G. Hall Michigan and Ohio Missouri Plan nation’s nonpartisan and partisan nonpartisan elections open seats Overall paign parties partisan and nonpartisan partisan ballots partisan elections partisan labels percent post-White predicted presidential election professionalization promote ads promote airings quality challengers R-squared retention elections Schotland seeking reelection Specifically Streb studies substantial supreme court elections supreme court justices televised attack advertising televised campaign advertising television advertising Texas Texas Supreme Court tions tisan trends U.S. Supreme Court unsafe seats variable vote shares voter turnout