Back to the Asylum: The Future of Mental Health Law and Policy in the United States
Today, American mental health law and policy promote the restoring of "law and order" in the community rather than protecting civil liberties for the individual. This compelling book recounts how and why mental health law is being reshaped to safeguard society rather than mentally ill citizens. The authors, both experts in the field, convincingly demonstrate how rapidly changing American values ignited two very different visions of justice for the mentally ill. They argue that during the "Liberal era"-- from 1960 to 1980-- Americans staunchly supported civil liberties for all, particularly for disadvantaged citizens like the mentally ill. Also, criminal law provided ample opportunities for mentally ill offenders to avoid criminal punishment for their crimes, and restrictive civil commitment laws made it difficult to hospitalize the mentally disabled against their will. During the "Neoconservative era"--from 1980 on-- however, the public demanded new laws as a result of the rise in crime and the increasing number of homeless in communities. These changes make it much more difficult for mentally ill offenders to escape criminal blame and far easier to put disturbed citizens into hospitals against their will. Back to the Asylum accurately describes how this abrupt shift in from protecting individual rights to protecting the community has had a major impact on the mentally ill. It examines these legal changes in their broader social context and offers a provocative analysis of these law reforms. Finally, this timely work forecasts the future of mental health law and policy as America enters the twenty-first century.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Madness and Responsibility
Law and Order in the Neoconservative Era
The Fate of the Insane Offender in the Neoconservative Era
Involuntary Commitment in the Liberal Era
Involuntary Commitment in the Neoconservative Era
The Road Back
Does Legal Reform Make a Difference?
The Future of Mental Health
Other editions - View all
acquittal American Psychiatric Association asylum behavior Civil Commitment civil commitment laws Code Ann coercive confined convicted crime criminal defendants criminal justice system criminal law criminal responsibility criminal trial criteria D.C. Cir dangerous decisions defendant’s deinstitutionalization detention diminished capacity diminished capacity defense drugs due process Durham effective evidence experts federal courts harm Hinckley Ibid individual inpatient insanity acquittees Insanity Defense Reform Insanity Plea insanity test institutions Involuntary Civil Commitment involuntary commitment involuntary hospitalization judges judicial jury legally insane legislation limited M'Naghten test mental health law mental health policy mental health professionals mental health system mental hospitals mental patients Mentally Disabled mentally disordered mentally ill offenders mentally ill person mitment moral Neoconservative outpatient commitment pathological gambling percent prison protection psychiatric hospitals punishment reason of insanity rehabilitation release sentencing serious society Stat statutes Supp Supreme Court therapeutic treatment United verdict victims York