What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action acts of terrorism Aerospace Doctrine Air Power Air University Review American armed conflict Armed Forces Journal bombing Brian Jenkins bureaucratic campaigns centrifical chapter citizens and interests civilian clandestine combat terrorism conduct counter counterterrorist forces covert definition diplomacy discussion doctrine of terrorism effectively engage in terrorism essentially reactive fight form of warfare guerrilla warfare incidents initiative intelligence community international terrorism involved JCS Pub JSOA leadership Low-Intensity Conflict Low-Intensity Operations military force modern terrorism narcoterrorism nonterritorial terrorism noted offensive measures operations against terrorists organizational doctrine personnel preemptive operations primarily psychological operations recognize that terrorism requirement Richard Clutterbuck role skyjackings special operations community special operations forces sponsor state-sponsored terrorism Stephen Sloan strategy tactics take the offensive task force Terrorism Counteraction terrorism preemption force terrorist act terrorist groups terrorist organizations unconventional Unconventional warfare United USAF violence war against terrorism war on terrorism Willard L
Page 41 - We must reach a consensus in this country that our responses should go beyond passive defense to consider means of active prevention, preemption, and retaliation. Our goal must be to prevent and deter future terrorist acts, and experience has taught us over the years that one of the best deterrents to terrorism is the certainty that swift and sure measures will be taken against those who engage in it.
Page 45 - Democracy fights in anger — it fights for the very reason that it was forced to go to war. It fights to punish the power that was rash enough and hostile enough to provoke it — to teach that power a lesson it will not forget, to prevent the thing from happening again.
Page 45 - A democracy is peace-loving. It does not like to go to war. It is slow to rise to provocation. When it has once been provoked to the point where it must grasp the sword, it does not easily forgive its adversary for having produced this situation. The fact of the provocation then becomes itself the issue. Democracy fights in anger — it fights for the very reason that it was forced to go to war. It fights...
Page 55 - It is the unlawful use or threat of violence against persons or property to further political or social objectives. It is generally intended to intimidate or coerce a government, individuals or groups to modify their behavior or policies.
Page 44 - Under the ombrella of such a policy, Americans would still welcome actions against terrorists that are swift, forceful and even aggressive. There is growing evidence the American people support timely, well-conceived, well-executed operations, such as the capture of the Achille Lauro hijackers. They endorse similar actions even if inadvertent casualties result. Also, those surveyed think Americans need to be made aware and reassured that US counterterrorist forces are highly trained and capable.
Page 32 - A broad spectrum of military and paramilitary operations conducted in enemy-held, enemy-controlled or politically sensitive territory. Unconventional warfare includes, but is not limited to, the interrelated fields of guerrilla warfare, evasion and escape, subversion, sabotage, and other operations of a low visibility, covert or clandestine nature.
Page 16 - Domestic terrorism is the unlawful use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual based and operating entirely within the United States or its territories without foreign direction committed against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.
Page 41 - Let terrorists be aware that when the rules of international behavior are violated, our policy will be one of swift and effective retribution.
Page 42 - It is absurd to argue that international law prohibits us from capturing terrorists in international waters or airspace; from attacking them on the soil of other nations, even for the purpose of rescuing hostages; or from using force against states that support, train, and harbour terrorists or guerrillas.
Page 58 - OMB and the Departments of State and Justice, would maintain this national programming document. Policy Criteria for Response to Terrorists Because acts of terrorism vary so much in time, location, jurisdiction and motivation, consistent response is virtually impossible. However, the Interdepartmental Group on Terrorism should prepare, and submit to the NSC for approval, policy criteria for deciding when, if and how to use force to preempt, react and retaliate.