Benchmarks of Fairness for Health Care Reform

Front Cover
This book addresses probing questions by translating the general moral concept of fairness into specific criteria for measuring the fairness of proposals for health reform. The authors demonstrate how concerned members of the public and policy makers can apply their benchmarks by actually scoring four major proposals for health care reform exemplifying the most prevalent ideas of the 1990s. They pay particular attention to the moral foundation of reforms based on competition. Although some reform ideas fare better than others, all are found weak in establishing open, democratic procedures for deciding the limits of care. The book also appraises the changes caused by the rapid growth of managed care systems since the collapse of national reform. Written by a leading moral philosopher of health care, an internationally known sociologist, and a health economist, Benchmarks of Fairness should be read by citizens, physicians, nurses, employers, and politicians.

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


Fairness and the Politics of Health Care Reform
Benchmarks of Fairness
Using the Benchmarks to Score Insurance Reforms
Using the Benchmarks to Score Health Care Reforms
Reorganization or Reform? The Fairness of Current Trends
Prospects for Fair Reform

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 179 - Patient-reported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy. The national Medicare experience: 1988-1990 (updated June 1993).

About the author (1996)

Norman Daniels, Ph.D., is Goldthwaite Professor of Philosophy and Medical Ethics at Tufts University. Donald W. Light, Ph.D., is Professor of Social and Behavioral Medicine at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. Ronald L. Caplan, Ph.D., is Assistant Professor of Public Health at Richard Stockton State College.

Bibliographic information