Beyond Repair?: America’s Death Penalty

Front Cover
Stephen P. Garvey
Duke University Press, Nov 1, 2002 - Social Science - 256 pages
0 Reviews
Can the death penalty be administered in a just way—without executing the innocent, without regard to race, and without arbitrariness? How does capital punishment in the United States fit with international human rights law? These are among the questions that leading legal scholars and journalists explore in Beyond Repair? All new, the essays in this collection focus on the period since 1976, when the Supreme Court held that capital punishment, in and of itself, does not violate the Constitution. In addition to reflecting on the most recent developments in the law, the contributors draw on empirical research to consider connections between newly available data and modern American death penalty procedures.

A number of the essays scrutinize thinking about capital punishment. They examine why, following almost two decades of strong public support for the death penalty, public opinion in favor of it has recently begun to decline. Beyond Repair? presents some of the findings of the Capital Jury Project, a nationwide research initiative that has interviewed over one thousand people who served as jurors in capital trials. It looks at what goes through the minds of jurors asked to consider imposing the death penalty, how qualified they are to make such an important decision, and how well they understand the judge’s instructions. Contributors also investigate the risk of executing the innocent, the role that race plays in determining which defendants are sentenced to death, and the effect of expanded restrictions on access to federal appellate relief. The postscript contemplates the peculiarities of our contemporary system of capital punishment, including the alarming variance in execution rates from state to state.

Filled with current insights and analysis, Beyond Repair? will provide valuable information to attorneys, political scientists, criminologists, and all those wanting to participate knowledgeably in the debates about the death penalty in America.

Contributors.
Ken Armstrong, John H. Blume, Theodore Eisenberg, Phoebe C. Ellsworth, Stephen P. Garvey, Samuel R. Gross, Sheri Lynn Johnson, Steve Mills, William A. Schabas, Larry W. Yackle, Franklin E. Zimring

 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Introduction Stephen P Garvey
1
Second Thoughts Americans Views on the Death Penalty at the Turn of the Century Samuel R Gross Phoebe C Ellsworth
7
Capital Punishment Federal Courts and the Writ of Habeas Corpus Larry W Yackle
58
Until I Can Be Sure How the Threat of Executing the Innocent Has Transformed the Death Penalty Debate Ken Armstrong Steve Mills
94
Race and Capital Punishment Sheri Lynn Johnson
121
Lessons from the Capital Jury Project John H Blume Theodore Eisenberg Stephen P Garvey
144
International Law and the Abolition of the Death Penalty William A Schabas
178
The Peculiar Present of American Capital Punishment Franklin E Zimring
212
Contributors
231
Index
233
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2002)

Stephen P. Garvey is Professor of Law at Cornell Law School.

Bibliographic information