Beyond the Burning Cross: A Landmark Case of Race, Censorship, and the First AmendmentDoes our abhorrence of racism allow us to ban certain forms of speech? This is the simple yet subversive question that Edward J. Cleary posed to the U.S. Supreme Court when, in 1991, he defended a white student who had burned a cross on a black family's lawn in St. Paul, Minnesota, violating a local ordinance against hate crimes. As a progressive, Cleary detested everything his client stood for. But in this compelling argued book he describes how he overturned the St. Paul ordinance—and convinced the Court to rule that "burning a cross is reprehensible. But St. Paul has sufficient means...to prevent such behavior without adding the First Amendment to the fire." |
Contents
A Constitutional Moment | |
Words That Injure Laws that Silence | |
Death and Decision | |
Speech Codes and Political | |
The Supreme Court Agrees | |
Clarence Thomas David Duke and R A V | |
2 | |
3 | |
Courage Tolerance and Vision | |
5 | |
The Court Hears Argument | |
An Occasion to Dance in the Streets | |
The Lessons of History | |
Other editions - View all
Beyond the Burning Cross: A Landmark Case of Race, Censorship, and the First ... Edward J. Cleary No preview available - 2011 |
Beyond the Burning Cross: A Landmark Case of Race, Censorship, and the First ... Edward J. Cleary No preview available - 1995 |