Blind Spots, Biases and Other Pathologies in the Boardroom
In this book we argue that as a first step it is important to recognize these group dynamics and the problems they cause. Some of them can be minimized through, for example, properly designed decision processes. Others are more complicated. But all of them need to be recognized and understood so that we can properly shape our expectations of the degree and quality of oversight corporate boards of directors can provide, and so that we can turn our energy toward the many group level factors that could improve board performance going forward.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
activist shareholders agenda arguments theory believe bers biases blind spots board chair board composition board evaluations board leaders board meetings board mem boardroom boards of directors causes chapter committees company’s consider contribute corporate governance create critical devil’s advocate direction disagreement discussion dissent diversity dynamics dysfunctional effects Enron example experience expertise factors failures focus functioning group decision group decision-making group dynamics group polarization group process groupthink habitual routines ideas identified important individual board members individual group members influence inherent interlocking directorates issues Janis’s Jehn lead less ment minimize negative norms occur option other’s outcome oversight particularly perceived perceptions performance person pluralistic ignorance position potential problems productiv productivity losses relationship conflict risk RiskMetrics risky risky shift role self-efficacy shared information bias shareholder activists shareholders simply sion situation social cohesion social comparison theory social loafing sources of power Storebrand Szulanski 2008 task conflict tend tion tive