Bound To Lead: The Changing Nature Of American Power
Is America still Number 1? A leading scholar of international politics and former State Department official takes issue with Paul Kennedy and others and clearly demonstrates that the United States is still the dominant world power, with no challenger in sight. But analogies about decline only divert policy makers from creating effective strategies for the future, says Nye. The nature of power has changed. The real-and unprecedented-challenge is managing the transition to growing global interdependence.
What people are saying - Write a review
Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified
Bound to lead: the changing nature of American powerUser Review - Not Available - Book Verdict
Nye, an eminent scholar of international relations and author of Nuclear Ethics ( LJ 5/1/86), joins the debate on the decline of American power with a blend of contemporary policy analysis and ... Read full review
Other editions - View all
ability alliance allies American argues balance basic become behavior believe Britain British century challenge changes chapter China Community Competitiveness concern continue costs countries critical culture decades decline defense domestic dominant early economic Economist effects empire Europe European example exports Fall force foreign foreign policy France future Germany global greater growth hegemony important increase industrial influence institutions interdependence interests investment issues Japan Japanese largest lead leaders leadership less major manufacturing markets mean measure military military power nuclear past percent period position postwar power resources Press problems question reduce reforms relations relative remains rising Robert role Science share situation social sources Soviet Union stability strategy strength strong success theory third threat tion trade transnational United University Washington weak weapons Western world politics York