Bridge Across the Abyss: Medical Myths and Misconceptions
A fearless investigation of mainstream medicine's most revered dogma, Bridge Across the Abyss is solidly based on trusted medical literature. Find out why advice from authorities on screening tests, blood transfusions, pain and anti-reflux medicines, vitamin supplementation, cholesterol and diet is often wrong. See how clinical trials are slanted. This is a single compendium consisting of a discussion that describes commonly employed clinical practices that are instituted and taught despite the surprising lack of data supporting their use. In essence, these have created a medical dogma that is seldom questioned and accepted as valid regardless of what the evidence has borne out.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
absolute risk reduction acid all-cause mortality American analysis anesthesia anesthetic animal fat arteries associated benefit biopsy blood cholesterol blood transfusion breast cancer breast cancer screening cancer mortality cardiovascular disease choles cholesterol level cholesterol-lowering Clin clinical trials colleagues colonoscopy colorectal cancer control group coronary heart disease death detection diagnosis diet dietary difference drugs endpoint epinephrine evidence evidence-based medicine experience fever HDL/LDL ratio heart attack hemoglobin high cholesterol High density lipoprotein hospital included increased individuals infection Iniö intake intervention JAMA Japanese Journal LDL cholesterol lesterol lipid lower mammograms mammography measure Melzack mg/dL neuromatrix number needed odds ratios outcome oxygen pain patients physicians placebo population practice prevent prostate cancer prostate-specific antigen randomized trials relative risk risk factor screening mammography screening tests significant simvastatin statins statistically surgical survival temperature terol testicular cancer therapy tion tissue total cholesterol treat treatment group vitamin women 40
Page 99 - Brun-Buisson C, Doyon F, Carlet J, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. A multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. French ICU Group for Severe Sepsis.
Page 104 - Raad I, Darouiche R, Dupuis J, et al. Central venous catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin for the prevention of catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infections. A randomized, double-blind trial.
Page 103 - Meduri GU, Mauldin GL, Wunderink RG, et al. Causes of fever and pulmonary densities in patients with clinical manifestations of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 1994; 106: 221-235.
Page 7 - There should be an accepted treatment for patients with recognized disease. 3. Facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available. 4. There should be a recognizable latent or early symptomatic stage. 5. There should be a suitable test or examination. 6. The test should be acceptable to the population. 7. The natural history of the condition, including development from latent to declared disease, should be adequately understood.