Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists, and the Study of International Relations
Colin Elman, Miriam Fendius Elman
MIT Press, 2001 - History - 431 pages
Bridges and Boundaries offers a conversation between what might loosely be described as traditionalist diplomatic and military historians, and political scientists who employ qualitative case study methods to examine international relations. The book opens with a series of chapters discussing differences, commonalities, and opportunities for cross-fertilization between the two disciplines.To help focus the dialogue on real events and research, the volume then revisits three empirical topics that have been studied at length by members of both disciplines: British hegemony in the nineteenth century; diplomacy in the interwar period and the causes of World War II; and the origins and course of the Cold War. For each of these subjects, a political scientist, a historian, and a commentator reflect on how disciplinary "guild rules" have shaped the study of international events. The book closes with incisive overviews by Robert Jervis and Paul W. Schroeder.
Bridges and Boundaries explores how historians and political scientists can learn from one another and illustrates the possibilities that arise when open-minded scholars from different disciplines sit down to talk.
What people are saying - Write a review
Case Studies and Process Tracing in History
THE THIRTY YEARS CRISIS 190939
THE RISE AND FALL OF BRITISH HEGEMONY
Martian and Venusian Perspectives on
When Did Britain Decline?
Historical Science and Cold War
International History and International
Why Historians Do It
About the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs