Building a Deliberative Democracy: An Evaluation of Two Citizens' Juries |
Contents
Citizens juries and citizen participation | 1 |
The two juries | 10 |
The jurors | 18 |
The process of deliberation | 24 |
Building citizenship? | 42 |
The experts | 49 |
The impact on commissioners and policy outcomes | 57 |
Afterword | 76 |
References | 82 |
Common terms and phrases
active Anna Coote assessing Belfast jurors challenge citizen participation citizenship commissioned commissioners considered consultation paper context contribute criteria criterion decision-making deliberative democracy deliberative methods deliberative process democratic practice different views Edna EHSSC evaluation of citizens evaluation strategy example expressed group representation health and social health service heard impact important included input interest invitation to take Iona IPPR issue under discussion issues of public juries commissioned jurors identified jury model jury process jury recommendations King's Fund knowledge learning living Marian Barnes McIver NHS Confederation Northern Ireland Northern Ireland Assembly observed opportunity organisation overall particular perspective plenary discussions policy outcomes positive potential process of deliberation public consultation public involvement public participation public policy questionnaires referred reflect represented response role small group sessions social services specific suggested Swansea jury term topic University of Birmingham University of Sheffield users voices Webler Wistow witness evidence witness responded young people's