CIA and the Vietnam Policymakers: Three Episodes, 1962-1968

Front Cover
DIANE Publishing, 1998 - Tet Offensive, 1968 - 167 pages
0 Reviews
Reviews the Intelligence Community's analytic performance during the chaotic Vietnam era, with particular focus on the efforts of CIA analysts. Offers a candid view of the CIA's intelligence assessments concerning Vietnam during three episodes between 1962 and 1968 and the reactions of senior U.S. policymakers to those assessments. Shows that CIA analysts had a firm grasp of the situation in Vietnam and expressed doubts that heightened U.S. military pressure alone could win the war. Contrary to the opinions voiced by Robert McNamara and others, this volume illustrates the expertise CIA officers brought to the Vietnam question. Photos.

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 26 - We are now launched on a course from which there is no respectable turning back: the overthrow of the Diem government .... there is no turning back because there is no possibility, in my view, that the war can be won under a Diem administration.
Page 159 - It is recognized that the threat of Communist aggression against Indochina is only one phase of anticipated Communist plans to seize all of Southeast Asia. . . . The neighboring countries of Thailand and Burma could be expected to fall under Communist domination if Indochina were controlled by a Communist-dominated government. The balance of Southeast Asia would then be in grave hazard.
Page 71 - We have been building our strength to fight this kind of war ever since 1961, and I myself am ready to substantially increase the number of Americans in Vietnam if it is necessary to provide this kind of fighting force against the Viet Cong.
Page 158 - The restrictive US press policy in Vietnam . . . unquestionably contributed to the lack of information about conditions in Vietnam which created an international crisis. Instead of hiding the facts from the American public, the State Department should have done everything possible to expose the true situation to full view.
Page 160 - In the conflict in Indochina, the Communist and nonCommunist worlds clearly confront one another on the field of battle. The loss of the struggle in Indochina, in addition to its impact in Southeast Asia and in South Asia, would therefore have the most serious repercussions on US and free world interests in Europe and elsewhere.
Page 104 - I am absolutely certain that whereas in 1965 the enemy was winning, today he is certainly losing. ... It is significant that the enemy has not won a major battle in more than a year.
Page 40 - [will mean] an ever-increasing commitment of US personnel without materially improving the chances of victory. ... In effect, we will find ourselves mired down in combat in the jungle in a military effort that we cannot win, and from which we will have extreme difficulty in extracting ourselves.
Page 80 - White-faced soldier armed, equipped and trained as he is not suitable guerrilla fighter for Asia forests and jungles. French tried to adapt their forces to this mission and failed. I doubt that US forces could do much better. . . . Finally, there would be ever present question of how foreign soldier
Page 56 - Even the Philippines would become shaky, and the threat to India on the West, Australia and New Zealand to the South, and Taiwan, Korea, and Japan to the North and East would be greatly increased.
Page 71 - Every time I get a military recommendation it seems to me that it calls for largescale bombing. I have never felt that this war will be won from the air.

References to this book

All Book Search results »

Bibliographic information