Capital Punishment: A Balanced Examination
Capital Punishment: a Balanced Examination, is a balanced and comprehensive overview of capital punishment. It also probes the constitutional implications of its implementation in America, and ponders some of the hard questions concerning its applications, such as how long capital appeals take. Mandery's examination of capital punishment requires the reader to think about some basic philosophical questions, such as would you ever kill? Each chapter begins with a primer of the issue at hand, followed by the data and critical documents necessary to make an educated assessment, and ending with essays offering differing viewpoints by some of the best minds in the country, including Stephen Nathanson, Hugo Adam Bedau, Michael Radelet, Scott Turow, Carol and Jordan Steiker, and Franklin Zimring.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
abolitionist aggravating circumstances aggravating factors American appeal arbitrariness argue argument attorney Baldus capital defendant capital murder capital punishment capital sentencing capital trials claim clemency Coker committed conclusion consider constitutional constitutionally convicted costs cruel and unusual culpability death penalty death penalty statutes death row inmates death row phenomenon death sentence decision defendant's deserve determine discretion Eighth Amendment Enmund error execution fact federal felony murder Fourteenth Amendments Furman future dangerousness Georgia Gregg guilt habeas habeas corpus homicide human impose the death imposition imprisonment individual inflicted ishment issue judge judgment jurors jury Justice Scalia juvenile kill legislative legislatures McCleskey McCleskey's ment mentally retarded mitigating evidence moral offenders opinion parole percent petitioner petitioner's prison procedural prosecutors question rape rapists reason relevant response result retribution risk robbery sentenced to death society Steiker Supreme Court tence Texas tion Tison underinclusion victim impact evidence violate