Carissa Marie Daniels, petitioner v. State of Washington, respondent, on petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington: petition for a writ of certiorari, Issue 8; Issue 1403
Carissa Marie Daniels, Thomas C. Goldstein, Pamela S. Karlan, Jeffrey L. Fisher, Amy Howe, Kevin K. Russell, United States. Supreme Court, Stanford University. Supreme Court Litigation Clinic
2009 - Law - 82 pages
Urges the Supreme Court to grant certiorari in order to determine whether the double jeopardy clause forbids reprosecution on a charge when a jury finds a defendant guilty of a less serious offense.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
RELEVANT CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION
Federal and State Courts Are Divided Over
The Question Presented Significantly Impacts
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
2d Cir 81 Wash 9th Cir abuse charge allow retrial Andress Arizona bars retrial boyfriend Brazzel Corrado counts Court of Appeals Crim crime of homicide criminal mistreatment Damon Davis declare a mistrial defendant guilty degree felony murder disagreement dissenting double jeopardy bars Double Jeopardy Clause Ervin felony murder charge find the defendant genuine deadlock greater charge greater offense guilty verdict Hescock homicide by abuse hung jury implied acquittal jeopardy terminated jurisdictions jurors Jury Inst jury instruction jury was unable jury's silence lesser charge lesser included offense lesser offense manifest necessity Miranda warnings murder conviction Ninth Circuit nonverdict obtain a conviction petitioner predicate offense predicated on criminal prosecutor reach a verdict retry Daniels return a verdict reversed second degree felony second degree murder Selvester shaken baby syndrome statements Daniels terminate jeopardy trial court U.S. Const unable to agree unable-to-agree instruction verdict form blank Washington Supreme Court WPIC