Carissa Marie Daniels, petitioner v. State of Washington, respondent, on petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington: reply brief for petitioner
Carissa Marie Daniels, Thomas C. Goldstein, Pamela S. Karlan, Jeffrey L. Fisher, Amy Howe, Kevin K. Russell, United States. Supreme Court, Stanford University. Supreme Court Litigation Clinic
Wilson-Epes Printing Co., 2009 - Law - 8 pages
Urges the Supreme Court to grant certiorari in order to determine whether the double jeopardy clause forbids reprosecution on a charge when a jury finds a defendant guilty of a less serious offense.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
1333 New Hampshire 19th St 2d Cir 559 Nathan Abbott 7272 Wisconsin Ave 9th Cir Abbott Way Stanford ability to retry abuse charge Amy Howe Kevin argument Arizona Bethesda Bordeaux Brazzel BRIEF FOR PETITIONER Cert Clinic 559 Nathan Counsel of Record Court Litigation Clinic declare a mistrial defendants Dickinson 6314 Dinitz disagreement Double Jeopardy Clause Ervin Feld LLP Fisher Counsel genuine deadlock Goldstein Akin greater charge Hampshire Ave Hauer & Feld homicide by abuse hung jury ington Supreme jurisdictions jury deadlock Karlan Stanford Law Law School Supreme Litigation Clinic 559 manifest necessity Murashige Ninth Circuit Petitioner simply Record Pamela rendering verdict REPLY BRIEF retrial is permitted Russell Sattazahn School Supreme Court Selvester show a manifest Stanford Law School Suite 20 Fircrest Supreme Court Litigation Supreme Court's decision trial court trial judge Tsanas U.S. 9 Wheat unable to agree United Washington Supreme Court's West Suite 20 Writ of Certiorari