Censorship and freedom of expression: essays on obscenity and the law |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
SELECTIONS FROM THE CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE | 1 |
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES MAJORITY OPINION | 19 |
THE OUTRAGEOUSLY IMMORAL FACT | 27 |
Copyright | |
5 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
acts adult Amendment American antiobscenity appealing to prurient argument arts attitudes behavior Catholic censor Charles Rembar citizens Clor Commission concern constitutional criminal decency decision definition delinquency democracy distinction effect erotic ethical Fanny Hill federal Figleaves film freedom of expression freedom of speech Ginzburg Hicklin human ideas indecent individual Jerome Frank Judge judgment Justice Douglas legislation liberal libertarian literary literature majority masturbation matter means ment nudity obscenity censorship obscenity statute offensive person political pornography problem protected prurient appeal prurient interest psychoanalyst public morality public opinion published punishment question reason redeeming social religion religious Report restraint Roth sadomasochistic sexual conduct sexual revolution shame Situation Ethics social importance social value society speech and press standards suppression Supreme Court taste things thoughts tion Tropic of Cancer United value theory violence voyeurism Walter Berns Warren's Profession words York young
Bibliographic information
| Title | Censorship and freedom of expression: essays on obscenity and the law Rand McNally public affairs series |
| Authors | Jerome Frank, Public Affairs Conference Center |
| Editor | Harry M. Clor |
| Publisher | Rand McNally, 1971 |
| Length | 175 pages |
| Subjects | › Censorship Obscenity (Law) Political Science / Censorship |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |