Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from France, India, Israel, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea, Thailand, the Uk, and Venezuela: An International Trade Investigation
DIANE Publishing, Jun 1, 1994 - 56 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
355 millimeters alleged material injury allegedly LTFV antidumping duties butt-weld pipe fittings capacity utilization carbon steel butt-weld certain carbon steel Chairman Newquist change rate index3 China and Thailand China/Thailand Final Commission's countervailing duty CR at C-3 cumulated declined determination diameter of less distributors domestic industry domestic like product domestic producers exports fittings from France Hackney Imports quantity Imports value increased India and Israel injured by reason inside diameter International Trade Commission inventories Malaysia Memorandum INV-R-048 million pounds Mills Iron percent from 1991 period of investigation petition Postconference Brief pounds in 1991 PR at H-6 preliminary investigations price data rate index reasonable indication related party sold steel butt-weld pipe subheading subject countries subject imports subject product Supp Supplementary Table Table C-l Thailand AST Tube Forgings Tube-Line U.S. consumption U.S. dollars U.S. International Trade U.S. producers unfinished carbon steel unfinished fittings Unit value United Kingdom USITC Pub Venezuela Weldbend
Page A-5 - are being, or are likely to be. sold in the United States at less than fair value within the meaning of section 731 of the Tariff Act of 1930. as amended (the Act), and that these imports are materially injuring, or threaten material injury to. a US industry.
Page A-3 - to determine whether there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured, or is threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports from
Page N-3 - (19 USC 1673b(a)) to determine whether there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of
Page 1-6 - A. In General In determining whether there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of the subject imports, the Commission must first define the "like product
Page 1-5 - antidumping duty investigations requires the Commission to determine, based upon the best information available at the time of the preliminary determination, whether there is a reasonable indication that a domestic industry is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of the allegedly LTFV
Page 1-3 - pursuant to section 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 USC § 1673b(a)), that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of certain
Page 1-5 - imports. 2 In applying this standard, the Commission weighs the evidence before it and determines whether "(1 ) the record as a whole contains clear and convincing evidence that there is no material injury or threat of material injury; and (2) no likelihood exists that any contrary evidence will arise in a final investigation.
Page 1-18 - the volume and prices of imports sold at fair value, contraction in demand or changes in patterns of consumption, trade, restrictive practices of and competition between the foreign and domestic producers, developments in technology, and the export performance and productivity of the domestic industry.
Page 1-3 - pursuant to section 703(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 USC § 1671b(a)), that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports from India and
Page 1-14 - LTFV imports, the Commission is required to "cumulatively assess the volume and effect of imports from two or more countries of like products subject to investigation if such imports compete with each other and with like products of the domestic industry in the United States market.