Certain Dielectric Miniature Microwave Filters and Multiplexers Containing Same
DIANE Publishing, Jul 1, 1995 - 123 pages
Determines that there is reason to believe that there is a violation in the importation, sale for importation, or sale in the U. S. after importation of dielectric miniature microwave filters. Considers the issues whether the public interest precludes issuance of relief.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
1977 Guillon article 1977 Plourde article 1980 Levy Survey Administrative Law Judge Asiasat axis Bell Bell Labs Brief of Respondent C-band capacitive cavity resonator claim 14 claim language Cohn Complaint composite resonator couple microwave energy described Dev argued Dev engineers Dev filter Dev Ltd Dev's Dev’s dielectric miniature microwave dielectric resonator element dielectric resonator filters directional filter disclosed dual mode dual-mode dielectric filters electric field elements of claim Fiedziuszko filter design filters and multiplexers Ford Aerospace frequency GE/Martin Marietta inequitable conduct infringement Intelsat VIII invention iris irises issue Kudsia Levy Survey Article McFall miniature microwave filters MMFs mode coupling screw motion for temporary multiplexers containing ordinary skill orthogonal modes patent examiner polystyrene prior art programs public interest Rantec Report references resonant mode satellite section 337 Space Systems/Loral SSL's SSL’s structure Tang temporary exclusion order temporary relief tuning means tuning screws
Page 19 - A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
Page 21 - Such secondary considerations as commercial success, long felt but unsolved needs, failure of others, etc., might be utilized to give light to the circumstances surrounding the origin of the subject matter sought to be patented. As indicia of obviousness or nonobviousness, these inquiries may have relevancy.
Page 36 - ... a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
Page 42 - Such information is material where there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable examiner would consider it important in deciding whether to allow the application to issue as a patent.
Page 2 - The importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation by the owner, importer, or consignee, of articles that infringe a valid and enforceable United States trademark registered under the Trademark Act of 1946.