Character as a subversive force in Shakespeare: the history and Roman plays
Shakespeare's history and Roman plays are usually discussed in terms of their political themes; their leading characters are imagined human beings who must be understood in motivational terms. Analyzing these characters with the aid of modern psychology (the theories of Karen Horney), this story attempts both to make sense of inconsistencies within the plays and the controversies they have produced.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Actium aggressive Antony and Cleopatra Antony's arrogant-vindictive Aufidius bargain battle battle of Agincourt becomes king behavior believe Bolingbroke Brutus Brutus's Caesar Cassius Cassius's character structure characterization claims Coriolanus Coriolanus's critics crown death defeat defenses despite dream E. M. Forster Falstaff fate father fear feel give glorified guilt Hal's Harfleur hath Henry Henry's honor Horney Hotspur Iago idealized image inner conflicts interpretation Julius Caesar Karen Horney kill last two acts live Macbeth mimesis mimetic characters mimetic portrait moral mother motives murder noble once patricians perfectionistic person play play's plebeians praise present protagonists psychological rage realistic reality rejection relationship response restore his pride revenge rhetoric Richard Richard III Roman Rome says scene search for glory seems self-effacing side self-hate sense Shakespeare Shakespeare's mimetic soliloquy speech suicide tells things thou threatens three acts throne tion understand victory vindication virtue Volsces Volumnia wants