Civil Liberties and Nazis: The Skokie Free-Speech Controversy
This study of civil liberties focuses on the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the dispute in Skokie, Illinois over the rights of members of the Nazi party to hold public demonstrations. Because this issue promoted at least one-fourth of the membership of the ACLU to take some form of action, ranging from objecting and reducing financial contributions to resigning, this conflict presents the opportunity for a case study of the conditions under which attitudes toward civil liberties are mobilized into behavior.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
1 Political Tolerance of the American Public
The Context of the SkokieNazi Dispute
The Nature of the Samples
23 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
abstract ACLU and Common ACLU leaders ACLU members ACLU's action affiliation allowed Amendment analysis attitude-behavior relationship belief systems Chaplinsky citizens civil liberties attitudes Common Cause members communists Conceptualization conflict consensus constraint context Court defectors defend democracy democratic deny elitist theory factors favor Frank Collin free speech freedom of assembly freedom of speech George Lincoln Rockwell Gibson and Richard incite instance intolerant behavior involvement Jewish Jewish Defense League Jews John Birch Society Klux Klan libertarian majority mass public members of ACLU membership Nazi demonstration Nazi issue non-Jews oppose organization percent permit person Piereson political minorities political tolerance position predicted prohibit public assembly public officials questionnaire religious represent rights of political sample similar activity Skokie dispute Skokie ordinances Skokie-Nazi specific opinions strongly subjects substantial Sullivan support for freedom survey swastika Table theory of democracy tolerance attitudes types of speech variables variance Village Manager Village of Skokie violence