Clinical Guidelines and the Law: Negligence, Discretion, and Judgement
Guidelines are powerful instruments of assistance to clinicians, capable of extending the clinical roles of nurses and pharmacists. Purchasers and managers perceive them as technological tools guaranteeing treatment quality. Guidelines also offer mechanisms by which doctors and other health care professionals can be made more accountable to their patients. - But how can clinicians tell whether a guideline has authority, and whether or not it should be followed? - Does the law protect doctors who comply with guidelines? - Are guideline developers liable for faulty advice? This timely book provides a comprehensive and accessible analysis of the many medical and legal issues arising from the current explosion of clinical guidelines. Featuring clear summaries of relevant UK, US and Commonwealth case law, it is vital reading for all doctors, health care workers, managers, purchasers, patients, and lawyers.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Nature and Context of Clinical Guidance
The Authority and Validity of Clinical Guidelines
The Legal Status of Clinical Guidelines
6 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
accepted action adopted advice alleged appropriate assess Blood Banks body of medical Bolam test brain damage breach British British Medical Association circumstances clinical decisions clinical discretion clinical freedom clinical guidelines clinical judgment Clinical Practice Guidelines clinicians common law consensus Court of Appeal decide defendant doctor Department of Health diagnosis drugs duty duty of care effect established Evaluation in Clinical evidence Evidence-Based Medicine expert testimony expert witness guideline development Health Service hospital House of Lords Hurwitz hypertension issues judge liability litigation London malpractice Medical Ethics Medical Law medical negligence medical practice ment National Health Service NHSE particular patient persistent vegetative physician plaintiff Plato prac practitioners prescribing procedures processes professional protocol reasonable recommendations reference relevant responsible body result risk role Royal College rules scientific skill standard of care standard of medical statements tion treatment users valid