Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science
Mark Turner Professor of English and Member of the Doctoral Faculty in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science University of Maryland
Oxford University Press, USA, 16 Αυγ 2001 - 192 σελίδες
What will be the future of social science? Where exactly do we stand, and where do we go from here? What kinds of problems should we be addressing, with what kinds of approaches and arguments? In Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science, Mark Turner offers an answer to these pressing questions: social science is headed toward convergence with cognitive science. Together they will give us a new and better approach to the study of what human beings are, what human beings do, what kind of mind they have, and how that mind developed over the history of the species. Turner, one of the originators of the cognitive scientific theory of conceptual integration, here explores how the application of that theory enriches the social scientific study of meaning, culture, identity, reason, choice, judgment, decision, innovation, and invention. About fifty thousand years ago, humans made a spectacular advance: they became cognitively modern. This development made possible the invention of the vast range of knowledge, practices, and institutions that social scientists try to explain. For Turner, the anchor of all social science - anthropology, political science, sociology, economics - must be the study of the cognitively modern human mind. In this book, Turner moves the study of those extraordinary mental powers to the center of social scientific research and analysis.
Τι λένε οι χρήστες - Σύνταξη κριτικής
Δεν εντοπίσαμε κριτικές στις συνήθεις τοποθεσίες.
action actual adaptive analogy analysis assumed assumption Balinese cockfight basic become begin blend called cause central choose cock cognitive science comes complex conceptual blending conceptual integration connections Consider construct counterfactual course create cultural Death descent develop effect elements emergent entirely example exist experience explain fact fight frame Geertz geometry give given historical human identical important individual inference influencing space Institute interaction interpretive invention involved kind knowledge less lines look match mathematical meaning mental models natural never offers operation organizing outcome particular path person pick play player political possible prefer present principles problem produce prove provides rational choice rational choice theory reasoning relations representation requires role round schema schemata scientists selection situation social science specific status structure theory things thought tion turn values