Cold Comfort: The Administration of the 2005 Single Payment Scheme by the Rural Payments Agency; Second Report, Session 2009-2010

Front Cover
This report sets out the results of investigation into complaints, using two representative case studies, about the administration of the 2005 Single Payment Scheme in England, including the Rural Land Register. The Ombudsman made five general findings of maladministration: the Rural Payments Agency did not meet the legal obligation to determine entitlements by 31 December 2005; Defra & RPA failed to heed the warning information of their own systems and from the Office of Government Commerce; RPA's and Defra's public statements in early 2006 failed to recognise the internal concerns they had; on 30 January 2006 Defra officials and Ministers considered RPA's position - the best case scenario was 70% of payments to be made by the end of March 2006 and they decided to tell Parliament that RPA would make the 'bulk' of payments by the end of March 2006; RPA was the only body ina position to estimate how much more digital mapping work it would have and its planning for the mapping process fell far short of getting it right. In short the Ombudman's principles of getting it right, being open and accountable and being customer focussed were not adhered to

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


The investigation how we set about our work on these complaints
my findings of fact about Rural Payments Agency the 2005 Single Payment
Anxiety about money due for payment to the bank and the landlord
my findings whether any such maladministration led to an injustice

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information