Colonialism and Grammatical Representation: John Gilchrist and the Analysis of the Hindustani Language in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries
A detailed study of Gilchrist’s grammatical praxis which presents a picture of the complex relationship between grammatical inquiry and the politics of colonial discourse in the early years of the Indian Empire.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Political Context
The Personal Context
8 other sections not shown
adpositions analogy anomaly argues argument asserts Bengali British Indian Monitor century Chambaud chapter characterises claims classical Cohn conjugations constitutes contemporary context dative David Lelyveld derived developed dialogues dictionary and grammar discussion Dufief eighteenth eighteenth-century engage English enquiry ergative etymological example express fact forms and structures functions George Hadley Gilchrist 1798b grammarians Greek Hadley's Halhed Henry Hadley Hindoostanee Hindustani language Hindustani verbs Hinduwee Home Tooke idea important Indian languages inflection irregular jargon John Home kind language learning language study Latin learners Lelyveld letter lingua franca Lowth material metalanguage metaplasm Mitand modern Monboddo morphology native speakers nature nominative nouns Oriental Linguist particular Persian Perso-Arabic script philosophical political postpositions practice prepositions presented principles problem pronouns provides published radical readers relationship rhetorical Robert Lowth role Sanskrit scholars scholarship sense sentences significant particles sound speech suggests technical term tradition Urdu verbal system vernacular vowels vyakarana words writers