Combating Terrorism: Funding Data Reported to Congress Should Be Improved
Congress responded to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, with dramatic funding increases to combat terrorism. Even before these attacks, Congress was concerned about increased funding in this area, and based on findings from a 1997 GAO report, mandated that the OMB report annually on funding to combat terrorism. In this review, GAO was asked to analyze such funding trends, describe difficulties in coordinating combating terrorism budgets, assess data reported to Congress, and describe the executive branch's efforts to maximize the effective use of combating terrorism funds. The review relied on OMB's definition of "combating terrorism" to include both homeland security and overseas combating terrorism missions. Charts and tables.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
$12 billion assess Brieﬁng Section Challenges in Effective combating terrorism funding Congress on Combating Coordination and Priority Counterterrorism deﬁnition Department of Defense Department of Homeland Departments and agencies difﬁculties duplication of effort emergency appropriation emergency supplemental appropriation enterprise architecture established Federal Emergency Management federal entities FEMA ﬁrst Fiscal ﬁscal year 2003 Funding Analysis Funding Data Reported funding increases funding priorities funds for combating govemmentwide guidance identiﬁed identify improve interagency June mission areas mission categories missions for combating national populace National Security agencies National Strategy obligation data OMB report OMB’s annual reports overseas combating terrorism performance measures performance plans physical security Priority Setting programs and activities proposed Department related to combating Report to Congress request for ﬁscal require agencies research and development responding to terrorist response September 11 attacks strategic plan Strategy for Homeland supplemental appropriation enacted terrorist incidents Transportation Security Transportation Security Administration Washington
Page 10 - We will also make copies available to others upon request. In addition, the report will be available at no charge on GAO's Web site at http://www.gao.gov. If you or your staff have any questions about this report, please contact me at (202) 512-7215 or email@example.com.
Page 59 - Act (GPRA) is the primary legislative framework through which agencies will be required to set strategic goals, measure performance, and report on the degree to which goals were met.
Page 42 - Security aligns and focuses homeland security functions into six critical mission areas: intelligence and warning, border and transportation security, domestic counterterrorism, protecting critical infrastructure, defending against catastrophic terrorism, and emergency preparedness and response. The...
Page 64 - Washington, DC: June 7, 2002. National Preparedness: Integrating New and Existing Technology and Information Sharing into an Effective Homeland Security Strategy.
Page 70 - August 30, 2002. Homeland Security: Effective Intergovernmental Coordination Is Key to Success. GAO-02-1013T. Washington, DC: August 23, 2002.
Page 6 - DC, in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. We requested comments on a draft of this report from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) or his designee. We received written comments from the OMB Controller. OMB's comments are discussed in the Agency Comments and Our Evaluation section and reprinted in appendix VI.
Page 70 - Washington, DC: July 17, 2002. Homeland Security: Title III of the Homeland Security Act of 2002. GAO-02-927T. Washington, DC: July 9, 2002. Homeland Security: Intergovernmental Coordination and Partnerships Will Be Critical to Success. GAO-02-899T. Washington, DC: July 1, 2002.