What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PLANNERS
A RESPONDENT GUIDE CARD
1 other sections not shown
accuracy actual agreement awareness of community behavior Chaffee changes Citizen Participation citizens and elected coefficients of determination cognitive community consensus community development community leaders community problems components concerns Control Community Understanding Cumberland Dane County decreased development priorities discussed ECDEV Education elected officials emergency medical services entertainment and recreation EREC feedback treatment gotten any information HCARE homeostatic hove increased information sharing interaction interview issues Journal levels of agreement Limited availability McLeod Nat Informed Neillsville officials and community past month perceived agreement planners problem categories problem importance ratings problem-type categories Rank Orderings relationships reported Research Hypothesis respondents Rural Sociology sample Scheff social systems Sociological Steven H stress structural subsystem systems theory Table Talcott Parsons theoretical three actor groups traffic and parking treatment and control Treatment Community Understanding University of Wisconsin University of Wisconsin-Madison variable Whot within-group agreement