Comparing Microscopic Activity-based and Traditional Models of Travel Demand: An Austin Area Case Study
Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 2007 - Choice of transportation - 122 pages
Two competing approaches to travel demand modeling exist today. The more traditional "4-step" travel demand models rely on aggregate demographic data at a traffic analysis zone (TAZ) level. Activity-based microsimulation methods employ more robust behavioral theory while focusing on individuals and households. While currently not widely used in practice, many modelers believe that activity-based approaches promise greater predictive capability, more accurate forecasts, and more realistic sensitivity to policy changes. Little work has examined in detail the benefits of activity-based models, relative to more traditional approaches. In order to better understand the tradeoffs between these two methodologies, this paper examines model results produced by both, in an Austin, Texas application. Results of the analysis reveal several differences in model performance and accuracy. In general, activity-based models are more sensitive to changes in model inputs, supporting the notion that aggregate models ignore important behavioral distinctions across the population. However, they involve more calibration and application effect, in order to ensure that synthetic populations match key criteria and that activity schedules match surveyed behaviors, while being realistic and consistent across household members.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
activity-based models adult with non-mandatory Austin Category children Presence choice altematives colsum l colsum colsuml colsuml colsum Compute Constants Model DAP Indicator Household Destination Choice Model destination indicator discretionary activities Driving Child Final Model ﬁrst for(d full-time working adults HHPerNo Household Characteristics household income household members if(Persons>1 indicator variables l colsum l l rowsum l lf(Category Likelihood for Constants Likelihood for Final logit Mand microscopic model microsimulation microsimulation model mode choice models mode1 model estimation Model Speciﬁcation Alternative model system MORPC multinomial logit non-mandatory activity non-working adults NonMand number of households Ordered Probit Other1 Parameters part-time working adults person type population synthesis Pre-driving child preschool children Presence & number primary activity PUMA rowsum l rowsum rowsuml rowsuml rowsum rowsuml,rowsuml,rowsuml scenario SerPerNo Shared Ride Shop3 simulation Speciﬁcation Alternative Patterns SPSS student adults t-ratio Coeff Table trafﬁc Transit travel behavior travel demand models trips wsum zone