Comparison of crown fire modeling systems used in three fire management applications
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2006 - Nature - 25 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
active crown fire Albini basal area BA bulk density canopy fuel characteristics Complete model inputs conditional crown fire crown fire behavior crown fire initiation crown fire occurrence crown fire potential crown fire spread Cruz DF stand different conifer stands Douglas-fir EFFM estimated FARSITE FBFM fire growth fire is expected fire is possible fire spread rate five different conifer FlamMap and NEXUS FlamMap predicted initial BA inputs are described lodgepole pine Missoula NEXUS computes open wind speed passive crown fire ponderosa pine ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir stand PPDF stand predicted active crown predicted crown fire predicted passive crown predicted surface fire range rate of spread Reinhardt 2001 Rfmai Scott and Reinhardt Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer simulate low thinning SNMC spread rate model stand as basal surface fire spread surface fuel consumption surface spread surface-crown spread rate systems predict understory removal Wagner wildland fire wind adjustment factor