Compromise and Political Action: Political Morality in Liberal and Democratic Life
No one likes to compromise, but we almost always do. Our politics and associations are built upon negotiation, respect for diversity, bargaining and elections. Compromise seems an awkward stepchild of morality and even dictionaries reflect its moral ambiguity.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Moral Claims in Political Life
Justifying Political Action
6 other sections not shown
abolitionists accept accomplish achieve actions allies anticommunism antislavery assessments autonomy and dignity bargain basic become beliefs Bernard Crick Chap citizens civil rights coalitions coercion commitments complexity compro concerns concrete conflict consequentialist defend demands democratic politics dimensions Eisenhower enemies enforcement ethical force gain give goals groups harm human imperative individuals institutions integrity interests involve issues John Rawls leaders legitimacy legitimate liberal and democratic liberal democracy limits Lyndon Johnson means ment mise moral absolutism moral claims moral point moral principles negotiation obligations one's opponents outcomes persons political actors political compromise political justification political morality political order politicians possess possible power base practices problem promises prudence prudential radical Republicans Raiffa reality reasons reflection reform Republicans requires respect responsibility rhetoric rituals role seek shape side slavery social solutions southern success symbolic T. V. Smith tion totalitarian utilitarian violence voting Whigs wrong