Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate

Front Cover
David Coady
Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2006 - Philosophy - 173 pages
0 Reviews
Conspiracy theories have a bad reputation. In the past, most philosophers have ignored the topic, vaguely supposing that conspiracy theories are obviously irrational and that they can be easily dismissed. The current philosophical interest in the subject results from a realisation that this is not so. Some philosophers have taken up the challenge of identifying and explaining the flaws of conspiracy theories. Other philosophers have argued that conspiracy theories do not deserve their bad reputation, and that conspiracy theorists do not deserve their reputation for irrationality. This book represents both sides of this important debate. Aimed at a broad philosophical community, including epistemologists, political philosophers, and philosophers of history, it represents a significant contribution to the growing interdisciplinary debate about conspiracy theories.

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


The Conspiracy Theory of Society
Of Conspiracy Theories
Living with the Conspiracy
Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorizing
Malevolent Global Conspiracy
Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition More Thoughts
Was it All

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2006)

Dr David Coady is from the School of Philosophy at the University of Tasmania, Australia.

Bibliographic information