Constituting Workers, Protecting Women: Gender, Law and Labor in the Progressive Era and New Deal Years
Constitutional considerations of protective laws for women were the analytical battlefield on which the legal community reworked the balance between private liberty and the state's authority to regulate. Julie Novkov focuses on the importance of gender as an analytical category for the legal system.
During the Progressive Era and New Deal, courts often invalidated generalized protective legislation, but frequently upheld measures that limited women's terms and conditions of labor. The book explores the reasoning in such cases that were decided between 1873 and 1937. By analyzing all reported opinion on the state and federal level, as well as materials from the women's movement and briefs filed in the U.S. Supreme Court, the study demonstrates that considerations of cases involving women's measures ultimately came to drive the development of doctrine.
The study combines historical institutionalism and feminism to address constitutional interpretation, showing that an analysis of conflict over the meaning of legal categories provides a deeper understanding of constitutional development. In doing so, it rejects purely political interpretations of the so-called Lochner era, in which the courts invalidated many legislative efforts to ameliorate the worst effects of capitalism. By addressing the dynamic interactions among interested laypersons, attorneys, and judges, it demonstrates that no individuals or institutions have complete control over the generation of constitutional meaning.
Julie Novkov is Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Oregon
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Early Struggles over Protective Labor Legislation
Regulating Labor and Laborers
The Ascendancy of Womens Legislation
Minimum Wages and the Battle over Equality
6 Reflecting on Gender Due Process and Constitutional Development
Other editions - View all
accepted activists Adkins advocates Amendment analysis argued arguments attorneys authority balancing bargaining began Brief century claimed conception concerning considering constitutional contract debate decision differences discussions doctrine due process early economic effect emerged employers equality established exercise explained factual federal female feminist Filed focus focused framework framing gendered ground guarantee individual industrial interest interpretation involving issues judges justices labor market largely League legal community liberty limit litigation Lochner male measures men’s ments minimum wages nature nodes of conflict Nonetheless opinions organizations particular period physical police power political promoting protective labor legislation protective legislation public interest question reasoning reformers regarding regulation relationship relied risks role ruling scope shift significant social sought specific state’s statutes struggled Supreme Court tion turn understanding Union uphold West Coast Hotel women women’s protective workers workplace