Constitutional rights after globalization
Constitutional Rights after Globalization juxtaposes the globalization of the economy and the worldwide spread of constitutional charters of rights. The shift of political authority to powerful economic actors entailed by neo-liberal globalization challenges the traditional state-centred focus of constitutional law. Contemporary debate has responded to this challenge in normative terms, whether by reinterpreting rights or redirecting their ends, e.g. to reach private actors. However, globalization undermines the liberal legalist epistemology on which these approaches rest, by positing the existence of multiple sites of legal production, (e.g. multinational corporations) beyond the state. This dynamic, between globalization and legal pluralism on one side, and rights constitutionalism on the other, provides the context for addressing the question of rights constitutionalism's counterhegemonic potential. This shows first that the interpretive and instrumental assumptions underlying constitutional adjudication are empirically suspect: constitutional law tends more to disorder than coherence, and frequently is an ineffective tool for social change. Instead, legal pluralism contends that constitutionalism's importance lies in symbolic terms as a legitimating discourse. The competing liberal and 'new' politics of definition (the latter highlighting how neoliberal values and institutions constrain political action) are contrasted to show how each advances different agenda. A comparative survey of constitutionalism's engagement with private power shows that conceiving of constitutions in the predominant liberal, legalist mode has broadly favoured hegemonic interests. It is concluded that counterhegemonic forms of constitutional discourse cannot be effected within, but only by unthinking, the dominant liberal legalist paradigm, in a manner that takes seriously all exercises of political power.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Constitutionalism in an Age of Globalization
Globalization and the Epistemological Challenge of Legal Pluralism
Globalization and the Reconfiguration of Political Power
13 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
abortion Accordingly action actors affirmative action apply approach argues argument assumptions Cambridge Canada challenge Charter of Rights classical liberal coherence constitutional adjudication constitutional law constitutional rights constitutional theory context corporations counterhegemonic decisions Democracy discourse DLR 4th doctrine Dworkin Dyzenhaus economic EHRR emphasises empirical epistemological example freedom of expression global economy hegemonic highlight Human Rights Ibid idea important individual institutions internal legal pluralism Irwin Toy issue judges judicial jurisprudence Keegstra Kleinhans and Macdonald law as integrity Law Journal LAW model Law Review legal order legal pluralist liberal legalism liberal legalist MNCs Morgentaler neoliberal non-state normative Oxford University Press paradigm political power politics of definition positive private power protect question regard relations rights constitutionalism Roe v Wade rule of law scholarship social state-centred Supreme Court Tamanaha tion tional Toronto transnational United Kingdom United Kingdom Series University of Toronto Washington consensus