Contemporary Problems in the Conflict of Laws: Essays in Honour of John Humphrey Carlile MorrisKenneth R. Simmonds, British Institute of International and Comparative Law |
Contents
Theory and Practice in | 34 |
Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co v Carroll 11 So 803 1892 235 | 67 |
Policy Controlled State Interest Analysis in Choice of Law | 99 |
Chaplin 1971 A C 356 237 243 | 107 |
Some Reflections Otto KahnFreund | 125 |
Reference Choice Restriction and Prohibition D St L Kelly | 157 |
Freehold Land Investments v Queensland Estates Pty Ltd 1970 44 | 171 |
Inherent Limitations in Statutes and the Conflict of Laws | 184 |
The Proposed New Law of Exemption Clauses and the Conflict | 203 |
Contract as a Tort Defence in the Conflict of Laws | 214 |
Johnson Re 1903 1 Ch 821 74 | 217 |
Some Thoughts on the Proper Law of a Tort P E Nygh | 232 |
Kays Leasing Corporation v Fletcher 1965 116 C L R 124 174 188 192 | 245 |
Marriage in American Conflict of Laws Willis L M Reese | 252 |
A Birds Eye View | 271 |
| 299 | |
Common terms and phrases
accident action adoption apply approach arbitration Chaplin characterisation choice of law choice-of-law rules claim claimant common law compensation concerned Conflict of Laws conflicts rules contract Court of Appeal Currie deceased defendant determine Dicey and Morris divorce domestic law domestic rule domicile effect England English court English law exemption clause fact favour foreign jurisdiction clause foreign law foreign rule governing the main husband Ibid incidental issue incidental question Incidental question arising incorporated injury interest analysis interpretation invalid involved judge jurisdiction agreement law governing law rules legislation lex causae lex fori lex loci delicti lex situs Lord marriage married matter negligence Ontario Oregon parties person plaintiff principle Private International Law problem products liability proper law provisions reason recognised reference relating relevant renvoi resident result rule of decision situation South Wales substantive supra Supreme Court tion validity wife wrongful death York Zealand