Contested Words: Legal Restrictions on Freedom of Speech in Liberal Democracies

Front Cover
Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., Jan 1, 2006 - Law - 233 pages
0 Reviews
In modern liberal democracies, rights-based judicial intervention in the policy choices of elected bodies has always been controversial. For some, such judicial intervention has trivialized and impoverished democratic politics. For others, judges have contributed to a dynamic and healthy dialogue between the different spheres of the constitution, removed from pressures imposed on elected representatives to respond to popular sentiment. This book provides a critical evaluation of ongoing debates surrounding the judicial role in protecting fundamental human rights, focusing in particular on legislative/executive abridgment of a core freedom in western society - namely, liberty of expression. A range of types of expression are considered, including expression related to electoral processes, political expression in general and sexually explicit forms of expression.

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


Rightsbased Judicial Review Constitutional Cultures
Political Parties Voters and Candidates
Comparative Constitutional Issues Arising from
The Constitutional Challenge Posed
Sexually Explicit Expression and the Courts
Protecting Expression as a Constitutional Value

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2006)

Ian Cram is Senior Lecturer and Convenor for the Human Rights Research Unit in the School of Law at Leeds University, UK.

Bibliographic information