Contracting for Better Places: A Relational Analysis of Development Agreements in Urban Development Projects

Front Cover
IOS Press, 2009 - Architecture - 376 pages
Large-scale urban development projects aim to create better places in underused or deteriorated areas. For their realization, cooperation between planning authorities and market parties is indispensable. Contracting for Better Places focuses on the development agreements that these parties close. It follows from the relational contract theory that, as the projects evolve over time, these agreements have to promote relational values such as trust and flexibility. This work displays four interesting cases: Battery Park City and Hudson Yards (both in New York City), Zuidas (Amsterdam) and King's Cross (London). The content, meaning and function of real-life development agreements of these focal projects are studied and criticized. The conclusions have a case-specific as well as a more general character.

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


Urban development projects and the problem of comparing contracts
Relational contract theory
Development agreements
Case study Battery Park City New York Plot 1617 The River House and 18b The Verdesian in Battery Park Citys North Residential Neighbourhood
Case Study Hudson Yards New York No 7 subway extension
Case Study Amsterdam Zuidas The Gershwin and Mahler4 projects
Kings Cross Regent Quarter London The Main Site
reflections on development agreements
Appendix A Examples of questions put to interviewees in case studies
Appendix B Case interviews
Appendix C Questions used as a basis for study of the written agreements
Curriculum Vitae

Comparative analysis of the cases on the basis of relational contract theory

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information