Costs of firefighting mopup activities
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1984 - Technology & Engineering - 5 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
9 responded Adjusted R2 aggregation approach analysis of wildlife Armando Gonzalez-Caban Average mopup costs average suppression cost best model BI*CAUSE BI*COVl Biomedical Computer Bulldozer-pile burn and burn Burning Index Clearwater Computer Programs COV1 Cover type Department of Agriculture Dollars/acre Estimating equation fire management fire season Fire size fire suppression fires 1 acre fiscal year 1981 Forest and Range Forest Service Forest variable Dummy fuel treatment Hand-pile ical parameters independent variables interaction terms Kootenai LNSIZE Lolo National Forest management costs McKetta ment mopup activities MOPUP COST ESTIMATES Mountain-Intermountain Climate Zone Nezperce nomic Northern Rocky Mountain-Intermountain number of hours Pacific Southwest Forest possible subset regressions predicted mopup cost Range Experiment Station Regression analysis regression model risk-sensitive Riverside Rocky Mountain-Intermountain Climate sample fire season cost show that mopup SIZE*COV2 SIZE*EL slope standard deviation Synoptic weather timates tion tional Forests tolerance interval total suppression cost U.S. Department variable Dummy variable Willamette Zone 9