Court reform of public institutions: what determines impact?
Donald N. Jensen, Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance (U.S.), National Institute of Education (U.S.)
Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance, School of Education, Stanford University, 1985 - Law - 48 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
administrators affected agenda attorneys behavior busing Commonwealth of Pennsylvania concerning costs and benefits Court intervention court involvement court ordered court reform court's reform decree Courts seeking decisionmaking difficult Donald N Educational Finance evaluation example executives factors federal Finance and Governance four case studies frame problems frustrated compliance handicapped children Ibid immediate target individual Institute for Research Institutional reform decrees institutional reform litigation institutional reform suits issue area J.Q. Wilson Jose judge seeking judicial reform lawsuit legal aid loosely coupled operations organizational outcome parents participants perceived plaintiffs policymaking political prison guards prison reform prison system problems procedures professional culture public agencies public bureaucracy public institution public organizations public policy reform public remedy Research on Educational responsibility Rhode Island role routine school district school principals special education programs special education system special masters staff Stanford Stanford University street level bureaucrats task waiting lists York City