Creating the Discipline of Knowledge Management: The Latest in University Research
Routledge, 2005 - Business & Economics - 242 pages
In this book Dr. Michael Stankosky, founder of the first doctoral program in knowledge management, sets out to provide a rationale and solid research basis for establishing Knowledge Management (KM) as an academic discipline. While it is widely known that Knowledge is the driver of our knowledge economy, Knowledge Management does not yet have the legitimacy that only rigorous academic research can provide. This book lays out the argument for KM as a separate academic discipline, with its own body of knowledge (theoretical constructs), guiding principles, and professional society.
In creating an academic discipline, there has to be a widely accepted theoretical construct, arrived at by undergoing scholarly scientific investigation and accompanying rigor. This construct becomes the basis for an academic curriculum, and proven methodologies for practice. Thus, the chapters in this book bridge theory and practice, providing guiding principles to those embarking on or evaluating the merits of a KM program.
As a methodology itself for undertaking the development of a body of knowledge, a KM Research Map was developed to guide scholars, researchers, and practitioners. This book presents this map, and showcases cutting-edge scholarship already performed in this nascent field by including the dissertation results of eleven KM scholar/practitioners.
*First book to provide cutting-edge research from new scholars in Knowledge Management
*Provides a rationale and research base for establishing knowledge management as an academic discipline
*Research from the first doctoral program in knowledge management in North America, at George Washington University
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
University Research Toward an Academic Discipline
Theory to PracticeA Continuum
3 Developing A Foundation For A Successful Knowledge Management System
4 An Empiric Study of Organizational Culture Types and their Relationship with the Success of a Knowledge Management System and the Flow of K...
a Matter of Trust
6 The State of Knowledge Management Practice in Taiwan
7 Relationship between Knowledge Management Technologies and Learning Actions of Global Organizations
8 Leveraging Knowledge Management Technologies to Manage Intellectual Capital
9 Knowledge Management Technology and Organizational Culture
Other editions - View all
actions conducted Adhocracy analysis approach assess Balanced Scorecard behavior Bontis business enterprise business processes Calabrese chief knowledge officer collaboration communities of practice companies competitive advantage components correlation culture type data warehousing defined economy effective employees Engineering Management enhance enterprise’s environment favored criteria Figure FIVA flow of knowledge focus four pillars framework George Washington University global organization goals Groupware Harvard Business School Heejun identified impact important improved information technology infrastructure innovation intangible assets intangible-asset integrated intellectual capital internal interpersonal trust KM efforts KM initiatives KM programs KM success KM system KM technologies knowledge assets Knowledge Management System knowledge sharing knowledge workers leadership learning leverage measure metrics Number orga organization’s organizational culture performance provides relationship respondents Retrieved October sectors SPAWAR Stankosky strategy structure successful KM survey Systems Engineering Table Taiwan Taiwanese today’s trust culture validated valuation value drivers variables